Persistence

LangGraph has a built-in persistence layer, implemented through checkpointers. When you compile a graph with a checkpointer, the checkpointer saves a checkpoint of the graph state at every super-step. Those checkpoints are saved to a thread, which can be accessed after graph execution. Because threads allow access to graph’s state after execution, several powerful capabilities including human-in-the-loop, memory, time travel, and fault-tolerance are all possible. Below, we’ll discuss each of these concepts in more detail. Checkpoints

LangGraph API handles checkpointing automatically When using the LangGraph API, you don’t need to implement or configure checkpointers manually. The API handles all persistence infrastructure for you behind the scenes.

Threads

A thread is a unique ID or thread identifier assigned to each checkpoint saved by a checkpointer. It contains the accumulated state of a sequence of runs. When a run is executed, the state of the underlying graph of the assistant will be persisted to the thread. When invoking a graph with a checkpointer, you must specify a thread_id as part of the configurable portion of the config:

{
  configurable: {
    thread_id: "1";
  }
}

A thread’s current and historical state can be retrieved. To persist state, a thread must be created prior to executing a run. The LangGraph Platform API provides several endpoints for creating and managing threads and thread state. See the API reference for more details.

Checkpoints

The state of a thread at a particular point in time is called a checkpoint. Checkpoint is a snapshot of the graph state saved at each super-step and is represented by StateSnapshot object with the following key properties:

config: Config associated with this checkpoint.
metadata: Metadata associated with this checkpoint.
values: Values of the state channels at this point in time.
next A tuple of the node names to execute next in the graph.
tasks: A tuple of PregelTask objects that contain information about next tasks to be executed. If the step was previously attempted, it will include error information. If a graph was interrupted dynamically from within a node, tasks will contain additional data associated with interrupts.

Checkpoints are persisted and can be used to restore the state of a thread at a later time. Let’s see what checkpoints are saved when a simple graph is invoked as follows:

import { StateGraph, START, END, MemoryServer } from "@langchain/langgraph";
import { withLangGraph } from "@langchain/langgraph/zod";
import { z } from "zod";

const State = z.object({
  foo: z.string(),
  bar: withLangGraph(z.array(z.string()), {
    reducer: {
      fn: (x, y) => x.concat(y),
    },
    default: () => [],
  }),
});

const workflow = new StateGraph(State)
  .addNode("nodeA", (state) => {
    return { foo: "a", bar: ["a"] };
  })
  .addNode("nodeB", (state) => {
    return { foo: "b", bar: ["b"] };
  })
  .addEdge(START, "nodeA")
  .addEdge("nodeA", "nodeB")
  .addEdge("nodeB", END);

const checkpointer = new MemorySaver();
const graph = workflow.compile({ checkpointer });

const config = { configurable: { thread_id: "1" } };
await graph.invoke({ foo: "" }, config);

import { StateGraph, START, END, MemoryServer } from "@langchain/langgraph";
import { withLangGraph } from "@langchain/langgraph/zod";
import { z } from "zod";

const State = z.object({
  foo: z.string(),
  bar: withLangGraph(z.array(z.string()), {
    reducer: {
      fn: (x, y) => x.concat(y),
    },
    default: () => [],
  }),
});

const workflow = new StateGraph(State)
  .addNode("nodeA", (state) => {
    return { foo: "a", bar: ["a"] };
  })
  .addNode("nodeB", (state) => {
    return { foo: "b", bar: ["b"] };
  })
  .addEdge(START, "nodeA")
  .addEdge("nodeA", "nodeB")
  .addEdge("nodeB", END);

const checkpointer = new MemorySaver();
const graph = workflow.compile({ checkpointer });

const config = { configurable: { thread_id: "1" } };
await graph.invoke({ foo: "" }, config);

After we run the graph, we expect to see exactly 4 checkpoints:

empty checkpoint with START as the next node to be executed
checkpoint with the user input {'foo': '', 'bar': []} and nodeA as the next node to be executed
checkpoint with the outputs of nodeA {'foo': 'a', 'bar': ['a']} and nodeB as the next node to be executed
checkpoint with the outputs of nodeB {'foo': 'b', 'bar': ['a', 'b']} and no next nodes to be executed

Note that the bar channel values contain outputs from both nodes as we have a reducer for the bar channel.

Get state

When interacting with the saved graph state, you must specify a thread identifier. You can view the latest state of the graph by calling graph.getState(config). This will return a StateSnapshot object that corresponds to the latest checkpoint associated with the thread ID provided in the config or a checkpoint associated with a checkpoint ID for the thread, if provided.

// get the latest state snapshot
const config = { configurable: { thread_id: "1" } };
await graph.getState(config);

// get a state snapshot for a specific checkpoint_id
const config = {
  configurable: {
    thread_id: "1",
    checkpoint_id: "1ef663ba-28fe-6528-8002-5a559208592c",
  },
};
await graph.getState(config);

In our example, the output of getState will look like this:

StateSnapshot {
  values: { foo: 'b', bar: ['a', 'b'] },
  next: [],
  config: {
    configurable: {
      thread_id: '1',
      checkpoint_ns: '',
      checkpoint_id: '1ef663ba-28fe-6528-8002-5a559208592c'
    }
  },
  metadata: {
    source: 'loop',
    writes: { nodeB: { foo: 'b', bar: ['b'] } },
    step: 2
  },
  createdAt: '2024-08-29T19:19:38.821749+00:00',
  parentConfig: {
    configurable: {
      thread_id: '1',
      checkpoint_ns: '',
      checkpoint_id: '1ef663ba-28f9-6ec4-8001-31981c2c39f8'
    }
  },
  tasks: []
}

Get state history

You can get the full history of the graph execution for a given thread by calling graph.getStateHistory(config). This will return a list of StateSnapshot objects associated with the thread ID provided in the config. Importantly, the checkpoints will be ordered chronologically with the most recent checkpoint / StateSnapshot being the first in the list.

const config = { configurable: { thread_id: "1" } };
for await (const state of graph.getStateHistory(config)) {
  console.log(state);
}

In our example, the output of getStateHistory will look like this:

[
  StateSnapshot {
    values: { foo: 'b', bar: ['a', 'b'] },
    next: [],
    config: {
      configurable: {
        thread_id: '1',
        checkpoint_ns: '',
        checkpoint_id: '1ef663ba-28fe-6528-8002-5a559208592c'
      }
    },
    metadata: {
      source: 'loop',
      writes: { nodeB: { foo: 'b', bar: ['b'] } },
      step: 2
    },
    createdAt: '2024-08-29T19:19:38.821749+00:00',
    parentConfig: {
      configurable: {
        thread_id: '1',
        checkpoint_ns: '',
        checkpoint_id: '1ef663ba-28f9-6ec4-8001-31981c2c39f8'
      }
    },
    tasks: []
  },
  StateSnapshot {
    values: { foo: 'a', bar: ['a'] },
    next: ['nodeB'],
    config: {
      configurable: {
        thread_id: '1',
        checkpoint_ns: '',
        checkpoint_id: '1ef663ba-28f9-6ec4-8001-31981c2c39f8'
      }
    },
    metadata: {
      source: 'loop',
      writes: { nodeA: { foo: 'a', bar: ['a'] } },
      step: 1
    },
    createdAt: '2024-08-29T19:19:38.819946+00:00',
    parentConfig: {
      configurable: {
        thread_id: '1',
        checkpoint_ns: '',
        checkpoint_id: '1ef663ba-28f4-6b4a-8000-ca575a13d36a'
      }
    },
    tasks: [
      PregelTask {
        id: '6fb7314f-f114-5413-a1f3-d37dfe98ff44',
        name: 'nodeB',
        error: null,
        interrupts: []
      }
    ]
  },
  StateSnapshot {
    values: { foo: '', bar: [] },
    next: ['node_a'],
    config: {
      configurable: {
        thread_id: '1',
        checkpoint_ns: '',
        checkpoint_id: '1ef663ba-28f4-6b4a-8000-ca575a13d36a'
      }
    },
    metadata: {
      source: 'loop',
      writes: null,
      step: 0
    },
    createdAt: '2024-08-29T19:19:38.817813+00:00',
    parentConfig: {
      configurable: {
        thread_id: '1',
        checkpoint_ns: '',
        checkpoint_id: '1ef663ba-28f0-6c66-bfff-6723431e8481'
      }
    },
    tasks: [
      PregelTask {
        id: 'f1b14528-5ee5-579c-949b-23ef9bfbed58',
        name: 'node_a',
        error: null,
        interrupts: []
      }
    ]
  },
  StateSnapshot {
    values: { bar: [] },
    next: ['__start__'],
    config: {
      configurable: {
        thread_id: '1',
        checkpoint_ns: '',
        checkpoint_id: '1ef663ba-28f0-6c66-bfff-6723431e8481'
      }
    },
    metadata: {
      source: 'input',
      writes: { foo: '' },
      step: -1
    },
    createdAt: '2024-08-29T19:19:38.816205+00:00',
    parentConfig: null,
    tasks: [
      PregelTask {
        id: '6d27aa2e-d72b-5504-a36f-8620e54a76dd',
        name: '__start__',
        error: null,
        interrupts: []
      }
    ]
  }
]

Replay

It’s also possible to play-back a prior graph execution. If we invoke a graph with a thread_id and a checkpoint_id, then we will re-play the previously executed steps before a checkpoint that corresponds to the checkpoint_id, and only execute the steps after the checkpoint.

thread_id is the ID of a thread.
checkpoint_id is an identifier that refers to a specific checkpoint within a thread.

You must pass these when invoking the graph as part of the configurable portion of the config:

const config = {
  configurable: {
    thread_id: "1",
    checkpoint_id: "0c62ca34-ac19-445d-bbb0-5b4984975b2a",
  },
};
await graph.invoke(null, config);

Importantly, LangGraph knows whether a particular step has been executed previously. If it has, LangGraph simply re-plays that particular step in the graph and does not re-execute the step, but only for the steps before the provided checkpoint_id. All of the steps after checkpoint_id will be executed (i.e., a new fork), even if they have been executed previously. See this how to guide on time-travel to learn more about replaying. Replay

Update state

In addition to re-playing the graph from specific checkpoints, we can also edit the graph state. We do this using graph.updateState(). This method accepts three different arguments:

`config`

The config should contain thread_id specifying which thread to update. When only the thread_id is passed, we update (or fork) the current state. Optionally, if we include checkpoint_id field, then we fork that selected checkpoint.

`values`

These are the values that will be used to update the state. Note that this update is treated exactly as any update from a node is treated. This means that these values will be passed to the reducer functions, if they are defined for some of the channels in the graph state. This means that update_state does NOT automatically overwrite the channel values for every channel, but only for the channels without reducers. Let’s walk through an example. Let’s assume you have defined the state of your graph with the following schema (see full example above):

import { withLangGraph } from "@langchain/langgraph/zod";
import { z } from "zod";

const State = z.object({
  foo: z.number(),
  bar: withLangGraph(z.array(z.string()), {
    reducer: {
      fn: (x, y) => x.concat(y),
    },
    default: () => [],
  }),
});

Let’s now assume the current state of the graph is

{ foo: 1, bar: ["a"] }

If you update the state as below:

await graph.updateState(config, { foo: 2, bar: ["b"] });

Then the new state of the graph will be:

{ foo: 2, bar: ["a", "b"] }

The foo key (channel) is completely changed (because there is no reducer specified for that channel, so updateState overwrites it). However, there is a reducer specified for the bar key, and so it appends "b" to the state of bar.

`as_node`

The final thing you can optionally specify when calling updateState is asNode. If you provide it, the update will be applied as if it came from node asNode. If asNode is not provided, it will be set to the last node that updated the state, if not ambiguous. The reason this matters is that the next steps to execute depend on the last node to have given an update, so this can be used to control which node executes next. See this how to guide on time-travel to learn more about forking state. Update

Memory Store

A state schema specifies a set of keys that are populated as a graph is executed. As discussed above, state can be written by a checkpointer to a thread at each graph step, enabling state persistence. But, what if we want to retain some information across threads? Consider the case of a chatbot where we want to retain specific information about the user across all chat conversations (e.g., threads) with that user! With checkpointers alone, we cannot share information across threads. This motivates the need for the Store interface. As an illustration, we can define an InMemoryStore to store information about a user across threads. We simply compile our graph with a checkpointer, as before, and with our new in_memory_store variable.

LangGraph API handles stores automatically When using the LangGraph API, you don’t need to implement or configure stores manually. The API handles all storage infrastructure for you behind the scenes.

Basic Usage

First, let’s showcase this in isolation without using LangGraph.

import { MemoryStore } from "@langchain/langgraph";

const memoryStore = new MemoryStore();

Memories are namespaced by a tuple, which in this specific example will be (<user_id>, "memories"). The namespace can be any length and represent anything, does not have to be user specific.

const userId = "1";
const namespaceForMemory = [userId, "memories"];

We use the store.put method to save memories to our namespace in the store. When we do this, we specify the namespace, as defined above, and a key-value pair for the memory: the key is simply a unique identifier for the memory (memory_id) and the value (a dictionary) is the memory itself.

import { v4 as uuidv4 } from "uuid";

const memoryId = uuidv4();
const memory = { food_preference: "I like pizza" };
await memoryStore.put(namespaceForMemory, memoryId, memory);

We can read out memories in our namespace using the store.search method, which will return all memories for a given user as a list. The most recent memory is the last in the list.

const memories = await memoryStore.search(namespaceForMemory);
memories[memories.length - 1];

// {
//   value: { food_preference: 'I like pizza' },
//   key: '07e0caf4-1631-47b7-b15f-65515d4c1843',
//   namespace: ['1', 'memories'],
//   createdAt: '2024-10-02T17:22:31.590602+00:00',
//   updatedAt: '2024-10-02T17:22:31.590605+00:00'
// }

The attributes it has are:

value: The value of this memory
key: A unique key for this memory in this namespace
namespace: A list of strings, the namespace of this memory type
createdAt: Timestamp for when this memory was created
updatedAt: Timestamp for when this memory was updated

Semantic Search

Beyond simple retrieval, the store also supports semantic search, allowing you to find memories based on meaning rather than exact matches. To enable this, configure the store with an embedding model:

import { OpenAIEmbeddings } from "@langchain/openai";

const store = new InMemoryStore({
  index: {
    embeddings: new OpenAIEmbeddings({ model: "text-embedding-3-small" }),
    dims: 1536,
    fields: ["food_preference", "$"], // Fields to embed
  },
});

Now when searching, you can use natural language queries to find relevant memories:

// Find memories about food preferences
// (This can be done after putting memories into the store)
const memories = await store.search(namespaceForMemory, {
  query: "What does the user like to eat?",
  limit: 3, // Return top 3 matches
});

You can control which parts of your memories get embedded by configuring the fields parameter or by specifying the index parameter when storing memories:

// Store with specific fields to embed
await store.put(
  namespaceForMemory,
  uuidv4(),
  {
    food_preference: "I love Italian cuisine",
    context: "Discussing dinner plans",
  },
  { index: ["food_preference"] } // Only embed "food_preferences" field
);

// Store without embedding (still retrievable, but not searchable)
await store.put(
  namespaceForMemory,
  uuidv4(),
  { system_info: "Last updated: 2024-01-01" },
  { index: false }
);

Using in LangGraph

With this all in place, we use the memoryStore in LangGraph. The memoryStore works hand-in-hand with the checkpointer: the checkpointer saves state to threads, as discussed above, and the memoryStore allows us to store arbitrary information for access across threads. We compile the graph with both the checkpointer and the memoryStore as follows.

import { MemorySaver } from "@langchain/langgraph";

// We need this because we want to enable threads (conversations)
const checkpointer = new MemorySaver();

// ... Define the graph ...

// Compile the graph with the checkpointer and store
const graph = workflow.compile({ checkpointer, store: memoryStore });

We invoke the graph with a thread_id, as before, and also with a user_id, which we’ll use to namespace our memories to this particular user as we showed above.

// Invoke the graph
const userId = "1";
const config = { configurable: { thread_id: "1", user_id: userId } };

// First let's just say hi to the AI
for await (const update of await graph.stream(
  { messages: [{ role: "user", content: "hi" }] },
  { ...config, streamMode: "updates" }
)) {
  console.log(update);
}

We can access the memoryStore and the user_id in any node by accessing config and store as node arguments. Here’s how we might use semantic search in a node to find relevant memories:

import {
  LangGraphRunnableConfig,
  BaseStore,
  MessagesZodState,
} from "@langchain/langgraph";
import { z } from "zod";

const updateMemory = async (
  state: z.infer<typeof MessagesZodState>,
  config: LangGraphRunnableConfig,
  store: BaseStore
) => {
  // Get the user id from the config
  const userId = config.configurable?.user_id;

  // Namespace the memory
  const namespace = [userId, "memories"];

  // ... Analyze conversation and create a new memory

  // Create a new memory ID
  const memoryId = uuidv4();

  // We create a new memory
  await store.put(namespace, memoryId, { memory });
};

As we showed above, we can also access the store in any node and use the store.search method to get memories. Recall the memories are returned as a list of objects that can be converted to a dictionary.

memories[memories.length - 1];
// {
//   value: { food_preference: 'I like pizza' },
//   key: '07e0caf4-1631-47b7-b15f-65515d4c1843',
//   namespace: ['1', 'memories'],
//   createdAt: '2024-10-02T17:22:31.590602+00:00',
//   updatedAt: '2024-10-02T17:22:31.590605+00:00'
// }

We can access the memories and use them in our model call.

const callModel = async (
  state: z.infer<typeof MessagesZodState>,
  config: LangGraphRunnableConfig,
  store: BaseStore
) => {
  // Get the user id from the config
  const userId = config.configurable?.user_id;

  // Namespace the memory
  const namespace = [userId, "memories"];

  // Search based on the most recent message
  const memories = await store.search(namespace, {
    query: state.messages[state.messages.length - 1].content,
    limit: 3,
  });
  const info = memories.map((d) => d.value.memory).join("\n");

  // ... Use memories in the model call
};

If we create a new thread, we can still access the same memories so long as the user_id is the same.

// Invoke the graph
const config = { configurable: { thread_id: "2", user_id: "1" } };

// Let's say hi again
for await (const update of await graph.stream(
  { messages: [{ role: "user", content: "hi, tell me about my memories" }] },
  { ...config, streamMode: "updates" }
)) {
  console.log(update);
}

When we use the LangGraph Platform, either locally (e.g., in LangGraph Studio) or with LangGraph Platform, the base store is available to use by default and does not need to be specified during graph compilation. To enable semantic search, however, you do need to configure the indexing settings in your langgraph.json file. For example:

{
    ...
    "store": {
        "index": {
            "embed": "openai:text-embeddings-3-small",
            "dims": 1536,
            "fields": ["$"]
        }
    }
}

See the deployment guide for more details and configuration options.

Checkpointer libraries

Under the hood, checkpointing is powered by checkpointer objects that conform to BaseCheckpointSaver interface. LangGraph provides several checkpointer implementations, all implemented via standalone, installable libraries:

@langchain/langgraph-checkpoint: The base interface for checkpointer savers (BaseCheckpointSaver) and serialization/deserialization interface (SerializerProtocol). Includes in-memory checkpointer implementation (MemorySaver) for experimentation. LangGraph comes with @langchain/langgraph-checkpoint included.
@langchain/langgraph-checkpoint-sqlite: An implementation of LangGraph checkpointer that uses SQLite database (SqliteSaver). Ideal for experimentation and local workflows. Needs to be installed separately.
@langchain/langgraph-checkpoint-postgres: An advanced checkpointer that uses Postgres database (PostgresSaver), used in LangGraph Platform. Ideal for using in production. Needs to be installed separately.

Checkpointer interface

Each checkpointer conforms to the BaseCheckpointSaver interface and implements the following methods:

.put - Store a checkpoint with its configuration and metadata.
.putWrites - Store intermediate writes linked to a checkpoint (i.e. pending writes).
.getTuple - Fetch a checkpoint tuple using for a given configuration (thread_id and checkpoint_id). This is used to populate StateSnapshot in graph.getState().
.list - List checkpoints that match a given configuration and filter criteria. This is used to populate state history in graph.getStateHistory()

Serializer

When checkpointers save the graph state, they need to serialize the channel values in the state. This is done using serializer objects. @langchain/langgraph-checkpoint defines protocol for implementing serializers and provides a default implementation that handles a wide variety of types, including LangChain and LangGraph primitives, datetimes, enums and more.

Capabilities

Human-in-the-loop

First, checkpointers facilitate human-in-the-loop workflows workflows by allowing humans to inspect, interrupt, and approve graph steps. Checkpointers are needed for these workflows as the human has to be able to view the state of a graph at any point in time, and the graph has to be to resume execution after the human has made any updates to the state. See the how-to guides for examples.

Memory

Second, checkpointers allow for “memory” between interactions. In the case of repeated human interactions (like conversations) any follow up messages can be sent to that thread, which will retain its memory of previous ones. See Add memory for information on how to add and manage conversation memory using checkpointers.

Time Travel

Third, checkpointers allow for “time travel”, allowing users to replay prior graph executions to review and / or debug specific graph steps. In addition, checkpointers make it possible to fork the graph state at arbitrary checkpoints to explore alternative trajectories.

Fault-tolerance

Lastly, checkpointing also provides fault-tolerance and error recovery: if one or more nodes fail at a given superstep, you can restart your graph from the last successful step. Additionally, when a graph node fails mid-execution at a given superstep, LangGraph stores pending checkpoint writes from any other nodes that completed successfully at that superstep, so that whenever we resume graph execution from that superstep we don’t re-run the successful nodes.

Pending writes

Additionally, when a graph node fails mid-execution at a given superstep, LangGraph stores pending checkpoint writes from any other nodes that completed successfully at that superstep, so that whenever we resume graph execution from that superstep we don’t re-run the successful nodes.

Capabilities

Run and debug

LangGraph APIs

Threads

Checkpoints

Get state

Get state history

Replay

Update state

`config`

`values`

`as_node`

Memory Store

Basic Usage

Semantic Search

Using in LangGraph

Checkpointer libraries

Checkpointer interface

Serializer

Capabilities

Human-in-the-loop

Memory

Time Travel

Fault-tolerance

Pending writes

Capabilities

Run and debug

LangGraph APIs

​Threads

​Checkpoints

​Get state

​Get state history

​Replay

​Update state

​config

​values

​as_node

​Memory Store

​Basic Usage

​Semantic Search

​Using in LangGraph

​Checkpointer libraries

​Checkpointer interface

​Serializer

​Capabilities

​Human-in-the-loop

​Memory

​Time Travel

​Fault-tolerance

​Pending writes

Threads

Checkpoints

Get state

Get state history

Replay

Update state

`config`

`values`

`as_node`

Memory Store

Basic Usage

Semantic Search

Using in LangGraph

Checkpointer libraries

Checkpointer interface

Serializer

Capabilities

Human-in-the-loop

Memory

Time Travel

Fault-tolerance

Pending writes