Skip to main content
Evaluations (“evals”) measure how well your agent performs by assessing its execution trajectory, the sequence of messages and tool calls it produces. Unlike integration tests that verify basic correctness, evals score agent behavior against a reference or rubric, making them useful for catching regressions when you change prompts, tools, or models. An evaluator is a function that takes agent outputs (and optionally reference outputs) and returns a score: 
def evaluator(*, outputs: dict, reference_outputs: dict):
    output_messages = outputs["messages"]
    reference_messages = reference_outputs["messages"]
    score = compare_messages(output_messages, reference_messages)
    return {"key": "evaluator_score", "score": score}
The agentevals package provides prebuilt evaluators for agent trajectories. You can evaluate by performing a trajectory match (deterministic comparison) or by using an LLM judge (qualitative assessment):
ApproachWhen to use
Trajectory matchYou know the expected tool calls and want fast, deterministic, cost-free checks
LLM-as-judgeYou want to assess overall quality and reasoning without strict expectations

​
Install AgentEvals

pip install agentevals
Or, clone the AgentEvals repository directly.

​
Trajectory match evaluator

AgentEvals offers the create_trajectory_match_evaluator function to match your agent’s trajectory against a reference. There are four modes:
ModeDescriptionUse case
strictExact match of message structure and tool calls in the same order (message content can differ)Testing specific sequences (e.g., policy lookup before authorization)
unorderedSame message structure and tool calls as reference, but tool calls can happen in any orderVerifying information retrieval when order doesn’t matter
subsetAgent calls only tools from reference (no extras)Ensuring agent doesn’t exceed expected scope
supersetAgent calls at least the reference tools (extras allowed)Verifying minimum required actions are taken
The examples below share a common setup, an agent with a get_weather tool: 
from langchain.agents import create_agent
from langchain.tools import tool
from langchain.messages import HumanMessage, AIMessage, ToolMessage
from agentevals.trajectory.match import create_trajectory_match_evaluator


@tool
def get_weather(city: str):
    """Get weather information for a city."""
    return f"It's 75 degrees and sunny in {city}."

agent = create_agent("claude-sonnet-4-6", tools=[get_weather])
The strict mode ensures trajectories contain identical messages in the same order with the same tool calls, though it allows for differences in message content. This is useful when you need to enforce a specific sequence of operations, such as requiring a policy lookup before authorizing an action.
evaluator = create_trajectory_match_evaluator(
    trajectory_match_mode="strict",
)

def test_weather_tool_called_strict():
    result = agent.invoke({
        "messages": [HumanMessage(content="What's the weather in San Francisco?")]
    })

    reference_trajectory = [
        HumanMessage(content="What's the weather in San Francisco?"),
        AIMessage(content="", tool_calls=[
            {"id": "call_1", "name": "get_weather", "args": {"city": "San Francisco"}}
        ]),
        ToolMessage(content="It's 75 degrees and sunny in San Francisco.", tool_call_id="call_1"),
        AIMessage(content="The weather in San Francisco is 75 degrees and sunny."),
    ]

    evaluation = evaluator(
        outputs=result["messages"],
        reference_outputs=reference_trajectory
    )
    # {
    #     'key': 'trajectory_strict_match',
    #     'score': True,
    #     'comment': None,
    # }
    assert evaluation["score"] is True
The unordered mode allows the same tool calls in any order. This is helpful when you want to verify that specific information was retrieved but don’t care about the sequence. For example, an agent that checks both weather and events for a city with different tool calls.
@tool
def get_events(city: str):
    """Get events happening in a city."""
    return f"Concert at the park in {city} tonight."

agent = create_agent("claude-sonnet-4-6", tools=[get_weather, get_events])

evaluator = create_trajectory_match_evaluator(
    trajectory_match_mode="unordered",
)

def test_multiple_tools_any_order():
    result = agent.invoke({
        "messages": [HumanMessage(content="What's happening in SF today?")]
    })

    reference_trajectory = [
        HumanMessage(content="What's happening in SF today?"),
        AIMessage(content="", tool_calls=[
            {"id": "call_1", "name": "get_events", "args": {"city": "SF"}},
            {"id": "call_2", "name": "get_weather", "args": {"city": "SF"}},
        ]),
        ToolMessage(content="Concert at the park in SF tonight.", tool_call_id="call_1"),
        ToolMessage(content="It's 75 degrees and sunny in SF.", tool_call_id="call_2"),
        AIMessage(content="Today in SF: 75 degrees and sunny with a concert at the park tonight."),
    ]

    evaluation = evaluator(
        outputs=result["messages"],
        reference_outputs=reference_trajectory,
    )
    assert evaluation["score"] is True
The superset and subset modes match partial trajectories. The superset mode verifies that the agent called at least the tools in the reference trajectory, allowing additional tool calls. The subset mode ensures the agent did not call any tools beyond those in the reference.
@tool
def get_detailed_forecast(city: str):
    """Get detailed weather forecast for a city."""
    return f"Detailed forecast for {city}: sunny all week."

agent = create_agent("claude-sonnet-4-6", tools=[get_weather, get_detailed_forecast])

evaluator = create_trajectory_match_evaluator(
    trajectory_match_mode="superset",
)

def test_agent_calls_required_tools_plus_extra():
    result = agent.invoke({
        "messages": [HumanMessage(content="What's the weather in Boston?")]
    })

    # Reference only requires get_weather, but agent may call additional tools
    reference_trajectory = [
        HumanMessage(content="What's the weather in Boston?"),
        AIMessage(content="", tool_calls=[
            {"id": "call_1", "name": "get_weather", "args": {"city": "Boston"}},
        ]),
        ToolMessage(content="It's 75 degrees and sunny in Boston.", tool_call_id="call_1"),
        AIMessage(content="The weather in Boston is 75 degrees and sunny."),
    ]

    evaluation = evaluator(
        outputs=result["messages"],
        reference_outputs=reference_trajectory,
    )
    assert evaluation["score"] is True
You can also set the tool_args_match_mode property and/or tool_args_match_overrides to customize how the evaluator considers equality between tool calls in the actual trajectory vs. the reference. By default, only tool calls with the same arguments to the same tool are considered equal. Visit the repository for more details.

​
LLM-as-judge evaluator

You can use an LLM to evaluate the agent’s execution path with the create_trajectory_llm_as_judge function. Unlike trajectory match evaluators, it doesn’t require a reference trajectory, but one can be provided if available. 
from agentevals.trajectory.llm import create_trajectory_llm_as_judge, TRAJECTORY_ACCURACY_PROMPT

evaluator = create_trajectory_llm_as_judge(
    model="openai:o3-mini",
    prompt=TRAJECTORY_ACCURACY_PROMPT,
)

def test_trajectory_quality():
    result = agent.invoke({
        "messages": [HumanMessage(content="What's the weather in Seattle?")]
    })

    evaluation = evaluator(
        outputs=result["messages"],
    )
    assert evaluation["score"] is True
If you have a reference trajectory, use the prebuilt TRAJECTORY_ACCURACY_PROMPT_WITH_REFERENCE prompt:
from agentevals.trajectory.llm import create_trajectory_llm_as_judge, TRAJECTORY_ACCURACY_PROMPT_WITH_REFERENCE

evaluator = create_trajectory_llm_as_judge(
    model="openai:o3-mini",
    prompt=TRAJECTORY_ACCURACY_PROMPT_WITH_REFERENCE,
)
evaluation = evaluator(
    outputs=result["messages"],
    reference_outputs=reference_trajectory,
)
For more configurability over how the LLM evaluates the trajectory, visit the repository.

​
Async support

All agentevals evaluators support Python asyncio. Async versions are available by adding async after create_ in the function name. 
from agentevals.trajectory.llm import create_async_trajectory_llm_as_judge, TRAJECTORY_ACCURACY_PROMPT
from agentevals.trajectory.match import create_async_trajectory_match_evaluator

async_judge = create_async_trajectory_llm_as_judge(
    model="openai:o3-mini",
    prompt=TRAJECTORY_ACCURACY_PROMPT,
)

async_evaluator = create_async_trajectory_match_evaluator(
    trajectory_match_mode="strict",
)

async def test_async_evaluation():
    result = await agent.ainvoke({
        "messages": [HumanMessage(content="What's the weather?")]
    })

    evaluation = await async_judge(outputs=result["messages"])
    assert evaluation["score"] is True

​
Run evals in LangSmith

For tracking experiments over time, log evaluator results to LangSmith. First, set the required environment variables: 
export LANGSMITH_API_KEY="your_langsmith_api_key"
export LANGSMITH_TRACING="true"
LangSmith offers two main approaches for running evaluations: pytest integration and the evaluate function. 
import pytest
from langsmith import testing as t
from agentevals.trajectory.llm import create_trajectory_llm_as_judge, TRAJECTORY_ACCURACY_PROMPT

trajectory_evaluator = create_trajectory_llm_as_judge(
    model="openai:o3-mini",
    prompt=TRAJECTORY_ACCURACY_PROMPT,
)

@pytest.mark.langsmith
def test_trajectory_accuracy():
    result = agent.invoke({
        "messages": [HumanMessage(content="What's the weather in SF?")]
    })

    reference_trajectory = [
        HumanMessage(content="What's the weather in SF?"),
        AIMessage(content="", tool_calls=[
            {"id": "call_1", "name": "get_weather", "args": {"city": "SF"}},
        ]),
        ToolMessage(content="It's 75 degrees and sunny in SF.", tool_call_id="call_1"),
        AIMessage(content="The weather in SF is 75 degrees and sunny."),
    ]

    t.log_inputs({})
    t.log_outputs({"messages": result["messages"]})
    t.log_reference_outputs({"messages": reference_trajectory})

    trajectory_evaluator(
        outputs=result["messages"],
        reference_outputs=reference_trajectory
    )
Run the evaluation with pytest:
pytest test_trajectory.py --langsmith-output
Create a LangSmith dataset and use the evaluate function. The dataset must have the following schema:
  • input: {"messages": [...]} input messages to call the agent with.
  • output: {"messages": [...]} expected message history in the agent output. For trajectory evaluation, you can choose to keep only assistant messages.
from langsmith import Client
from agentevals.trajectory.llm import create_trajectory_llm_as_judge, TRAJECTORY_ACCURACY_PROMPT

client = Client()

trajectory_evaluator = create_trajectory_llm_as_judge(
    model="openai:o3-mini",
    prompt=TRAJECTORY_ACCURACY_PROMPT,
)

def run_agent(inputs):
    return agent.invoke(inputs)["messages"]

experiment_results = client.evaluate(
    run_agent,
    data="your_dataset_name",
    evaluators=[trajectory_evaluator]
)
To learn more about evaluating your agent, see the LangSmith docs.
Edit this page on GitHub or file an issue.
Connect these docs to Claude, VSCode, and more via MCP for real-time answers.